In these instances, a neutron can decay into a proton and electron, adding an proton to the nucleus (making it an atom of a different element) and ejecting the electron from the nucleus.

Medicine is Science, but it isn’t always right. The cancer did not kill him. It has been proven to be the best pain reliever. Meanwhile you are highly suspicious of anything that has objective evidence.This is pretty much the perfect definition of pseudo-science. Originally Posted by babe I am not a scientist.

Meanwhile you are highly suspicious of anything that has objective evidence.This is pretty much the perfect definition of pseudo-science. I would also look at traditional empirical data from Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine. Can you prove that or not?

If you can’t show it with the scientific method, can you show it with another way of knowing? Let’s discuss it.안녕하새요A Core Component Of Emotional Experience: A Conditioned Response Of The Affect ComponHiggs BosonFree Engineering e-Solutions for Energy Conversion Systemsa Cosmic OdysseyQuestions on ionic liquids, electrochemical cell and acetanijustification of the structure of calcium carbideAbout quantum impulse h and h*. I am not a scientist.

My nephew just passed away, and he had pancreatic cancer. Free electrons can exist, but tend to interact with atoms when they encounter them. I would look at the empirical experience of others in the community, including Naturopaths. On this site, I keep seeing these pseudo-scientific claims to the effect that “if there is any empirical data, it will come from science” or “faith in Jesus is not objective” or “Ayurveda is nonsense”. But if you want to get into science, could you refer me to your best study which shows that statins work for a certain group of people at least.

Related Discussions:Designed to irritateFor daytonturner: Fifty ways to irritate an atheistThe “God” geneDo most men have sexual preferences for adolescent girls?Jupiter Earth connectionRunny NoseIntroduction of a Light WeaverCollecting heat from roads, for electricityEugenics proves that science is evil!Mrs. The radiation did. Originally Posted by patricius79 As far as “the plural of anecdote is not data”–please show that using data. you show me your anecdotes (or experience, as you describe them), and i’ll tell you whether it adds up to a bag of beansarm waving about the experience of traditional medicine is pretty vague and definitely does not amount to even a single datum point My nephew just passed away, and he had pancreatic cancer. For example, you keep stating that I don’t believe science works.

Originally Posted by marnixR Originally Posted by patricius79 As far as “the plural of anecdote is not data”–please show that using data. you show me your anecdotes (or experience, as you describe them), and i’ll tell you whether it adds up to a bag of beansarm waving about the experience of traditional medicine is pretty vague and definitely does not amount to even a single datum point You stated “the plural of anecdote is not data”. In these instances, a neutron can decay into a proton and electron, adding an proton to the nucleus (making it an atom of a different element) and ejecting the electron from the nucleus. These quarks, like electrons were formed during the early moments of the universe.* Neutrons on their own are not stable and have a half-life of ~15 min.

WHY should he have had to suffer! OR ANYONE ELSE!! What is WRONG with this picture? Your asperger’s is showing. At first there was no way to distinguish between matter and energy.

So, ignoring the objective evidence again in favour of random stuff made up by people trying to exploit your gullibility. Neutrons are made up of three fundamental particles called quarks. That doesn’t mean Science doesn’t also help or cure, but it is not perfect. that’s the difference between proximate and ulltimate cause : without radiation therapy the cancer would have got him in the end anywaymy dad died of pneumonia, but the final push was the high level of morphine to keep the pain at bay after his kidneys had started to fail – does that mean you should advocate not giving patients morphine ? hardly My nephew just passed away, and he had pancreatic cancer.

The radiation did. Time for you to go. HEROIN is ILLEGAL. This all seems to be rhetoric rather than science. What “empirical data”? If there is any, it will come from science. Science is not perfect or RIGHT all the time. This is not very common and occurs only under special circumstances.

The one oncologist feels that the radiation machine was not calibrated correctly, or he was over dosed with it, which caused his stomach to ulcerate and create varicose veining creating massive ulcers and ultimately he bled to death. Can you prove that or not? If you can’t show it with the scientific method, can you show it with another way of knowing? there’s other ways of finding stuff – some call it common sense or logic, or learning from experienceexperience has taught me that anecdotes are the half-brother of personal witness statements : the worst possible and least reliable type of evidenceweak evidence doesn’t improve just because you gather more instances of iti suppose a philosopher of science could prove this using the scientific method if s/he so felt like doing, but tbh i can’t be arsedyour way of demanding proof and then defining what shape that proof should take (clearly in order that you can then find fault with it) becomes tiresome Join the community today at Biology-Forums.com!http://www.biology-forums.com [/url] God says God is a one woman God. Source please.

Originally Posted by marnixR Originally Posted by babe I am not a scientist. The radiation did. What I am so angyr with is the pain issues. But there is no objective evidence that it will do you any good.Do you see the problem? You latch onto any old crap that you believe and assume it will work.

The one oncologist feels that the radiation machine was not calibrated correctly, or he was over dosed with it, which caused his stomach to https://www.gcccks.edu/student/ ulcerate and create varicose veining creating massive ulcers and ultimately he bled to death. I would also look at traditional empirical data from Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine. None of these are ever substantiated with with scientific proof. Originally Posted by marnixR there’s other ways of finding stuff – some call it common sense or logic, or learning from experienceexperience has taught me that anecdotes are the half-brother of personal witness statements : the worst possible and least reliable type of evidence Here is a good paper on the importance of evidence-based medicine: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials The vast majority of electrons were formed during the early moments of the Universe’s formation.

The one oncologist feels that the radiation machine was not calibrated correctly, or he was over dosed with it, which caused his stomach to ulcerate and create varicose veining creating massive ulcers and ultimately he bled to death. Are neutrons and electrons ever present outside of atoms? Are they just floating around in space? Are they too made up of atoms/neutrons/electrons etc, and if so how do they come into existence in the first place? There is a lot of information on the internet regarding mind control or rather mond control techniques being used on people (apparently used by military).Does anyone on here know if there is such a thing going on?Have you heard of tavistock institute of human relations?Is it ok to experiment on people without their consent?

Originally Posted by patricius79 Dr. What “empirical data”? If there is any, it will come from science. I would look at the empirical experience of others in the community, including Naturopaths. Can you prove that or not?

If you can’t show it with the scientific method, can you show it with another way of knowing? That’s just asinine. Related Discussions:Mind Control – RF jammersIs voice to skull mind control real or imagined.Identity and linguistic acrobaticsSunrise From The Westastrologytis quickProgramming a brain?Would you like Neverfly to return?The CowspiracyMind control Originally Posted by Strange Which is very nice. Originally Posted by patricius79 Originally Posted by marnixR Originally Posted by patricius79 As far as “the plural of anecdote is not data”–please show that using data. you show me your anecdotes (or experience, as you describe them), and i’ll tell you whether it adds up to a bag of beansarm waving about the experience of traditional medicine is pretty vague and definitely does not amount to even a single datum point You stated “the plural of anecdote is not data”. We have hired a team of biologists to answer all your homework questions.

Free neutrons (those outside the nucleus of an atom) will decay into a proton and electron ( protons are stable and are also made from quarks.) While in general, neutrons mixed in with protons in the nucleus of an atom are stable, in some atoms, there is an excess of neutrons. That doesn’t mean Science doesn’t also help or cure, but it is not perfect. So in essence, what we have now is a mix of particles mostly made up of ones that formed early on and some that formed from the process of decay that goes on even today. * when our universe was really young, it was very hot and dense. Science is not perfect or RIGHT all the time. Find a thread on the forum entitled “Fifty ways to irritate an atheist” – and close it down : )Dude – you asked for that one : ) Science is not perfect or RIGHT all the time.

No Mary thank you. John Ioannidis, who says most published research findings are false. How’s that? No value in this thread……………………… See you soon on the thread about “personal theories”.Raymond Electrons are, as far as we know, fundamental particles, and are not made up of any smaller constituents.

So, ignoring the objective evidence again in favour of random stuff made up by people trying to exploit your gullibility. WHAT THE F is that about…you are dying…who CARES if you get addicted. Then as it expanded and cooled, it eventually reached a kind of “quark soup”( which also included electrons), which a custom essay service
cooled further causing the quarks to collect into neutrons, protons, etc. Originally Posted by patricius79 Originally Posted by marnixR Originally Posted by patricius79 As far as “the plural of anecdote is not data”–please show that using data. you show me your anecdotes (or experience, as you describe them), and i’ll tell you whether it adds up to a bag of beansarm waving about the experience of traditional medicine is pretty vague and definitely does not amount to even a single datum point You stated “the plural of anecdote is not data”. That doesn’t mean Science doesn’t also help or cure, but it is not perfect. that’s the difference between proximate and ulltimate cause : without radiation therapy the cancer would have got him in the end anywaymy dad died of pneumonia, but the final push was the high level of morphine to keep the pain at bay after his kidneys had started to fail – does that mean you should advocate not giving patients morphine ? hardly Actually they thought the cancer was dead, but not operable due to the location of it having to do with his blood system flow He had already had extensive chemo (i.e. the worse cocktail you ever took for 4 months beforehand so his immune system was already suppressed as were his probiotics to say the least.

Related Discussions:Blowing the noseI consider, that you are mistaken. Also, you state that traditional medicine is “random stuff” from people “trying to exploit [my] gullibility”. Even in terminal patients because of it’s addictive qualities. In some cases, there might be an excess of protons, and a proton will actually convert into a neutron by emitting a positron (an anti-electron).

It is just an idea that needs to be fed, but I can’t do it alone, I need your help. The cancer did not kill him. Related Discussions: Hi everybody!I am here to expose a theory of mine about mass. I don’t believe that you can prove your ideas here using the scientific method.

The cancer did not kill him.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*